Open Access

Development of air conditioning technologies to reduce CO2 emissions in the commercial sector

Carbon Balance and Management20061:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-1-12

Received: 06 September 2006

Accepted: 25 October 2006

Published: 25 October 2006

Abstract

Background

Architectural methods that take into account global environmental conservation generally concentrate on mitigating the heat load of buildings. Here, we evaluate the reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions that can be achieved by improving heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) technologies.

Results

The Climate Change Research Hall (CCRH) of the National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) is used as a case study. CCRH was built in line with the "Green Government Buildings" program of the Government Buildings Department at the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport in Japan. We have assessed the technology used in this building, and found that there is a possibility to reduce energy consumption in the HVAC system by 30%.

Conclusion

Saving energy reduces CO2 emissions in the commercial sector, although emission factors depend on the country or region. Consequently, energy savings potential may serve as a criterion in selecting HVAC technologies with respect to emission reduction targets.

Background

Heating, ventilating, air conditioning (HVAC) and lighting systems in buildings are a major source of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the commercial sector. Reduction of this source is a common issue for Asian countries that share similar constraints in developing solutions [1, 2].

In Japan, a cooperative academic, industrial, and governmental project has been established to develop a new system called the Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency (CASBEE). It evaluates all forms of energy usage within buildings [3].

The Climate Change Research Hall (CCRH: completed in 2001, ferroconcrete, three floors, 4900 m2 total floor space) at the National Institute for Environmental Studies in Japan was constructed according to the latest sustainable environment designs, including global warming abatement technology for buildings [4].

Consumption of electricity for lighting, which is related to the interior heat generation load, changes little from season to season. This building is equipped with 32 W high-frequency fluorescent lights whose intensity is controlled to keep a constant brightness independent of the outdoor brightness. The automatic control of lighting was found to realize approximately 30% in annual energy savings compared to lighting with no automatic control [5].

Here, we assess the HVAC technologies used throughout this building (Figure 1) by quantifying the mitigation of the environmental burden achieved by using these technologies and management options as related to technology, institutions and culture [6].
Figure 1

The system composition of CCRH.

Results

Proceeding from data on energy consumption, HVAC control, and the indoor and outdoor environment, we developed a system for coordinating fan coil units (FCUs) and air-handing units (AHUs). Coordinated control and operation of FCUs and AHUs shuts down FCUs when the heat load through the windows is small. In rooms where occupants and other inside heat sources are fewer than anticipated by design, it imposes limits on excessive space cooling and uses AHU blower operation, which is more effective against room temperature increases than AHU cooling operation in the winter. This decreases energy loss and also provides comfort. According to calculations based on measurement data from the 2004 fiscal year, reducing the operating loss of FCUs and AHUs promises an HVAC energy reduction of about 30% (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Primary energy consumption of CCRH.

In conjunction with changing the room temperature settings, we conducted a questionnaire on comfort, and obtained responses from over half of the room occupants. When the room temperature setting was lowered to 22°C, more respondents said they felt discomfort or slight discomfort than at 23°C. Also, regardless of the temperature to which the setting was changed, reports for the room perimeters were not as good as those for the interiors (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Winter comfort questionnaire.

Discussion

In the case of HVAC, the threshold between comfortable and uncomfortable conditions is very narrow. Control of temperature must be designed carefully in order to maximize energy reduction without imposing stress on the room occupants.

Accurate room temperature monitoring data should be fed back to the well-designed ventilation system based on a numerical model that takes into account the environmental and room use conditions. Such an intricate system designed specifically for an individual building will lead to maximum energy savings without disturbing the activities of its occupants.

Based on this concept, we evaluate energy savings potential (ESP) [7]:

ESP = Annual energy consumption from air-conditioning Baseline energy consumption from air-conditioning MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=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@AE77@

in two ways,

ESP 1 = Annual energy consumption from air-conditioning Baseline energy consumption from air-conditioning according to greenhouse gas inventories MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=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@E354@
ESP 2 = Annual energy consumption from air-conditioning Baseline energy consumption from air-conditioning under optimal HVAC control MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=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@D143@

The total value of primary energy consumption in typical offices in the 2004 fiscal year was reported to be approximately 2000 MJ/m2/yr by the Building-Energy Manager's Association of Japan. This total amount approximates the values in the greenhouse gas inventory of Japan [8].

Annual HVAC energy consumption of a typical office in CCRH was 1058 MJ/m2/yr in 2004. However, according to the Building-Energy Manager's Association of Japan, general offices under HVAC control should have an annual consumption rate of 828 MJ/m2/yr. Therefore, we set the baseline energy consumption from air-conditioning to 828 MJ/m2/yr in accordance with the greenhouse gas inventories. Thus, ESP1 of CCRH was estimated to be 1.28 in 2004.

Baseline energy consumption under optimal HVAC control was estimated at 817 MJ/m2/yr in 2004 using an approach similar to that of Ishida and Mori [9]. This makes ESP2 equal to 1.30.

Conclusion

Increasing awareness of environmental issues has led to development of a large number of energy conservation technologies for buildings, especially in more developed countries [4]. Energy savings potential (ESP) is a very important indicator for developing these technologies.

In Japan, attempts are being made to create policies such as the standards for planning eco-buildings by the Government Buildings Department at the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. This document introduces approximately 50 methods and technologies and provides calculation formulas that can be evaluated using ESP.

Saving energy reduces CO2 emissions in the commercial sector, although emission factors depend on the country and region [1]. Therefore, we have to evaluate the methods developed in Japan for use in carbon management across the Asian region.

Methods

As in ordinary office buildings, the HVAC system of the building used in this research has FCUs on the window-side perimeter, while room interiors have AHU conditioning systems incorporating variable air volume (VAV) system control (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Virtual definition for control (indoor environment).

The consumption of electricity for lighting, which is related to the interior heat generation load, changes little from season to season. The building in question is fitted with 32 W high-frequency fluorescent lighting with automatic lighting control performing initial intensity correction (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Electrical consumption from lighting, electrical outlets and number of room occupants.

The energy consumption of the HVAC system is shown in Figure 6. On weekdays in the summer, cooling is achieved mainly with interior HVAC units (AHUs). When the outside temperature is 25°C or higher, window perimeter HVAC units (FCUs) are also used. In the winter, when the outside temperature is 10°C or lower, FCU heating and AHU cooling are used. There are concerns about energy operating loss due to simultaneous use of chilled and hot water, but it is hoped that energy will be saved through improvements to the system.
Figure 6

Annual energy consumption of HVAC system.

However, energy managers cannot determine whether a particular indoor environment is comfortable or not from the HVAC monitor, especially when users open the windows to let in outside air.

Comfort is different for each space-conditioned area. To examine the room temperature and temperature distribution in the experimental room (FCU, VAV detected temperature), we performed measurements (Figure 7) of temperatures at 5 different heights (100, 500, 1200, 1800, and 2600 mm) in 3 locations: on the perimeter, which is sensitive to improved envelope performance and changes in outdoor conditions, and in the interior (center and hallway side). Data on vertical temperature distribution collected from August 1, 2005 to February 5, 2006 over the space-conditioning hours of 10:00 to 20:00 are plotted in Figure 8 as averages and standard deviations of temperature variation range over the time period of the research.

In both summer and winter, the window perimeter was affected by outdoor meteorological changes. In winter, there are large temperature differences by height, making it difficult to maintain comfort.
Figure 7

Detailed measurements in tested room.

Figure 8

Vertical temperature distribution in representative room (summer at left, winter at right).

We plotted the difference between FCU inlet temperature and AHU outlet temperature (Δt) against the AHU air supply temperature at each measurement point (Figure 9) in order to illustrate the circumstances described above. We wanted to consider the indoor environment created by combined FCU and AHU operation, and by the design response of the AHU HVAC system including building openings. The small heat consumption at 26°C, near the upper limit of the AHU air supply temperature, suggests the effectiveness of blower operation and outside-air cooling operation in the summer and intermediate period, as well as the effectiveness of natural ventilation and of letting in cool air by opening windows and shutting down AHUs. In winter, we found an energy operating loss, caused by the effect of FCU space heating that calls for reducing AHU space cooling.
Figure 9

Relationship between HVAC outlets and inlets (energy loss).

Table 1 provides the main model parameter of the tested indoor environment.
Table 1

Parameter of heat load computing model (CCRH when designed)

   

Perimeter zone

Interior zone

Direction

Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan : For the true south

Area

13.43 m2

199.23 m2

 

summer

9:00

387.34 W/m2

140 W/m2; temperature 26°C, humidity 50%

  

12:00

479.82 W/m2

140 W/m2; temperature 26°C, humidity 50%

  

14:00

515.93 W/m2

140 W/m2; temperature 26°C, humidity 50%

  

16:00

464.93 W/m2

140 W/m2; temperature 26°C, humidity 50%

 

winter

1223.83 W/m2

134.25 W/m2; temperature 22°C, humidity 40%

Quantity of outdoor air intake

 

30.0 m3/(h·people)

Over hang

1500 mm

 

Area of glass

61.7 m2

 

Rate of glass area

85.1%

 

Area of internal wall

 

Floor:189.06 m2, Face of wall 72.5 m2

Floor height

4200 mm

Ceiling height

2700 mm

Window shade

Minimum calorie that uses window shade 100 W/m2

 

Heat gain from occupancy

SH69W/people, LH53W/people, Dencity of occupancy 0.17 people/m2

Heat generation rate of electrical outlets

29.75 W/m2 (tested room 32 W/m2)

Cooling load from lighting

Illuminance 700lx, 20 W/m2

Thermal capacity from

12.6 kJ/m3·°C(default)

Table 2 gives the main measurement points, and includes detailed measurements of this indoor environment.
Table 2

The data of CCRH monitoring

  

Tested room

Controled room

Area coverd by research

1. Outside conditions (data at 10-minute intervals)

Wall insolation (1 points), outside air temperature (2 points)

2. Indoor environment (data at 10-minute intervals)

Tested room temperature

◦ (1 point)

◦ (5 points)

◦ (22 points)

 

PMV

◦ (1 point)

×

×

 

Vertical temperature distribution

◦ (5 points× 3)

×

×

 

Globe thermometer

◦ (2 points)

×

×

 

Window pane temperature

◦ (7 points)

×

×

 

Exhaust outlet temperature

◦ (3 points)

×

×

3. State of HVAC (data at 30-minute intervals)

FCU heat and airflow amounts

◦ (1 point)

◦ (5 points)

◦ (4 points× 5;correction needed)

 

AHU heat and airflow amounts

×

◦ (5 points)

◦ (4 points× 5)

 

VAV operation state

◦ (Temperature and humidity 2 points, anemometers 2 points)

◦ (30 points)

◦ (6 points× 22)

4. Room electricity consumption (data at 30-minute intervals)

Lighting

◦ (By system, 3 points)

◦ (2 points)

◦ (4 points× 2)

 

Electrical outlets

◦ (1 point)

◦ (1 point)

◦ (4 points)

5. Total

About 1400 points throughout building (295 points in area coverd by research)

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was accomplished under the "Development and Practical Application of Energy Conservation Measures" project, funded by the Ministry of the Environment (Japan). The experiments have been carried out under the supervision of Yutaka Tonooka, Hideaki Nakane and Yasumi Fujinuma with the help of Takashi Inoue, Kazuyuki Kamimura, and Yasuo Utsumi. Gen Inoue was involved in drafting the manuscript, and contributed substantially to its conception. Shaney Crawford corrected the use of English.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies

References

  1. Umemiya C: Improving GHG inventories by regional information exchange: a report from Asia. Carbon Balance and Management 2006, 1: 9. doi:10.1186/1750–0680–1-9 doi:10.1186/1750-0680-1-9 10.1186/1750-0680-1-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ministry of the Environment, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Office of JAPAN (GIO): National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of JAPAN 2006 ver.2. Tsukuba. 2006.Google Scholar
  3. Japan Sustainable Building Consortium (JSBC):Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency (CASBEE). Tokyo. 2006. [http://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/index.htm]Google Scholar
  4. Chikada M, Inoue T, et al.: Evaluation of Energy Saving Methods in a Research Institute Building, CCRH. PLEA2001-The 18th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Florianopolis-BRAZIL 2001, 883–888.Google Scholar
  5. Inoue T, Yoshida Y, Ichinose T: Evaluation of Energy Saving Methods in a Research Institute Building: Effects of Thermotropic Glass. PLEA2003-The 20th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Santiago-CHILE 2003, G-15: 6–10.Google Scholar
  6. Canan P: Relation Between Regional Carbon Management and Technology. Symposium 21st Century Business Scenarios to Increase the Prevalence of Global Warming Mitigation Technology, Tsukuba 2006, 40–45.Google Scholar
  7. Zhu Y: Energy Performance Evaluation of Public Architectural Air-conditioning System Operation. China-Japan Symposium on Building and Urban Energy/Environmental System, Tokyo 2006, 119–130.Google Scholar
  8. The Building-Energy Manager's Association of Japan: FY2004 primary energy consumption report: Tokyo. 2005.Google Scholar
  9. Ishida T, Mori S: The Optimum Air Conditioning System Model Under Constraints of the Economical Efficiency in the Commercial Building. The 21st Energy System/Economics/Environment Conference, Japan Society of Energy and Resources 2005, 27–2: 481–484.Google Scholar
  10. Tonooka Y, Ishida T, Fukazawa O, Baba T, Nakaguchi T: Measures on GHGs Emission Reduction in Building Sector in JAPAN Part3. The 22st Energy System/Economics/Environment Conference, Tokyo 2006, 35–3.Google Scholar
  11. Ikaga T, Murakami S, Kato S, Shiraishi Y: Estimation of CO 2 Emission Associated with Building Construction and Operation till 2050 in Japan: Study on Social Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings and Cities. J Archt Plann Environ Eng 2000, 535: 53–58.Google Scholar
  12. Yamaguchi Y, Shinoda Y, Asai T, Mizuno M: Framework forthe development of an urban energy system with a long-term perspective. The 2005 World Sustainable Building Conference in Tokyo, Tokyo 2005, 07–009: 2387–2394.Google Scholar
  13. Kilkis B, Schmidt D, et al.: Alternative andSustainable Technologies, Exergy Analysis and Sustainability, Part 1: Fundamentals. 2006 Advancing HVAC&R to serve humanity and promote a sustainable world (ASHRAE) annual meeting, Seminar 14 2006.Google Scholar
  14. Nakicenovic N, Kolp P, Riahi K, Kainuma M, Hanaoka T: Assessment of Emissions Scenarios Revisited. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 2006, 7: 137–173. DOI 10.1007/s10018–005–0110–0 DOI 10.1007/s10018-005-0110-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Saito M, Mori S, Dowaki K: An Analysis of the Relationships between IT Investments and the Industrial Structure Change in Japan using Input-Output Tables – Historical Analysis and Future Projection. In Environmental Communication in the Information Society: Proc. of the 16-th Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection. Vienna Edited by: Pillmann W, Tochtermann K. 2002, 493–496.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Yoshida; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.